Holmes v. State

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

A jury found Anthony Holmes guilty of possession of cocaine. He challenges his conviction on the grounds that the circumstantial evidence did not support his constructive possession of the drug. We affirm on this point without discussion.

Holmes also seeks review of certain conditions of his probation on the basis that they were not announced at sentencing. We affirm condition 5, the intoxicant condition, and condition 6, the employment condition, because they are general conditions of probation that need not be orally pronounced. State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589…