Legal Opinion

Randolph v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 15, 1946No. 11761PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant suing under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(20), to récover disability retirement pay, claimed to be due him as a Lieutenant Colonel in the Army under Section 456, Title 10 U.S.C.A., was met by a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

The District Judge sustained the motion, and, on the authority of United States v. Beaman, 5 Cir., 61 F.2d 493, Morgan v. United States, 5 Cir., 115 F.2d 426, and Smith v. United States, 4 Cir., 57 F.2d 998, dismissed the cause.

Appellant is here claiming that Dismuke v. United States, 297 U.S. 167, 56 S.Ct. 400, 80 L.Ed. 561, is to the contrary.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  3. Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Almour v. Pace, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Darr v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. William J. Powers, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  4. Jones v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
  5. Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API