Randolph v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant suing under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(20), to récover disability retirement pay, claimed to be due him as a Lieutenant Colonel in the Army under Section 456, Title 10 U.S.C.A., was met by a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
The District Judge sustained the motion, and, on the authority of United States v. Beaman, 5 Cir., 61 F.2d 493, Morgan v. United States, 5 Cir., 115 F.2d 426, and Smith v. United States, 4 Cir., 57 F.2d 998, dismissed the cause.
Appellant is here claiming that Dismuke v. United States, 297 U.S. 167, 56 S.Ct. 400, 80 L.Ed. 561, is to the contrary.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Almour v. Pace, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Darr v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- William J. Powers, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.