Legal Opinion

Majeska v. Dannenbaum

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1933No. Appeal 402PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Ctjeiam,

This is an appeal from the order of the court discharging the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant the sum of $125 by virtue of a written agreement providing for such payment each month during the period of her life. The consideration for the payment is the wife’s relinquishing her right title and interest in certain personal property.

The defendant alleges that this consideration is mentioned merely to lend color to the) agreement and that the real consideration was an arrangement between the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. BuhlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Irvin v. IrvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Rodenbaugh v. RodenbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Thommen v. Thommen's, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Forbes v. ForbesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API