Legal Opinion

" AUTOMATIC" SPRINKLER CORP. v. BF Goodrich Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 16, 1977PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These are appeals by "Automatic" Sprinkler Corporation of America (A.T.O.) and H.K. Ferguson Company from partial summary judgments entered in behalf of B.F. Goodrich Company against both of the appellants, respectively. The appeals are premature and will be dismissed.

B.F. Goodrich filed an action against H.K. Ferguson, A.T.O. and General Electric Company seeking damages on account of breach of contract, negligence, and breach of express and implied warranties, resulting from a spill of a highly toxic environmental contaminant on plaintiff's premises. The trial court, on motion of B.F.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Moody v. State Ex Rel. PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Taylor v. Major Finance Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Logue v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dzwonkowski v. Sonitrol of Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Robinson v. Computer Servicenters, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Tanner v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. James v. Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Bacadam Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. KennardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API