Legal Opinion

Helen Rothenberg, Caveator, Estate of Pincus Rothenberg, Deceased v. Allen Rothenberg

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 8, 1960No. 15098PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant as widow of the late Pincus Rothenberg filed a caveat against his will. The District Court on motion of the ap-pellees 1 dismissed the caveat, and this appeal followed.

Appellees argue that the widow is not a “party in interest” within the meaning of D.C.Code § 19-307 (1951). Relying upon Kimberland v. Kimberland, 2 they say the widow lacks standing when “she has the statutory power to renounce her deceased spouse’s will and to claim the same share of the estate as she would take by intestacy if the will were held invalid.” The District Court had agreed with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Owen LattimoreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  2. Kimberland v. KimberlandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. Corinne B. Randall v. Grace Fitzpatrick BockhorstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. Moore v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. Perkins v. BergerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Washington & Lee University v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API