Legal Opinion

City of Kalamazoo v. Balkema

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 89, Calendar No. 35,087PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

The city of Kalamazoo, plaintiff, brought condemnation proceedings in order to acquire six lots belonging to defendants. These lots adjoin Upjohn Park, which is centrally located and not far from the business district of Kalamazoo. It was desired to acquire defendants’ property for the extension of the playgrounds of the park so as to provide for baseball grounds and a football field. The jury determined that there was a necessity for taking the property and awarded defendants the sum of $7,500 as compensation. Defendants have appealed and claim a number of errors.

It is claimed that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Commissioners of Parks & Boulevards v. MoestaMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Perkins v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Chicago, & Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. AlexanderWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Shebley v. QuatmanOregon Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Sammond v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. City of Detroit v. DETROIT PLAZA LTD. PARTNERSHIPMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Jack Loeks Theatres, Inc v. City of KentwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Western Michigan University Board of Trustees v. SlavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API