Legal Opinion
Moore v. Miciotto
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 2003No. 36,727-WCAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
J^KOSTELKA, J.
Paula Leanne Moore (“Moore”) appeals a judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation in favor of her former employer, Ronald J. Miciotto (“Miciotto”) denying her claim jfor disability benefits, medical expenses, penalties and attorney fees. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Facts
Moore was employed part-time doing secretarial work for Miciotto, a Shreveport attorney, from May 1992 through December 31, 1998. On December 21, 1999, she filed a disputed claim for workers’ compensation disability benefits and medical expenses against Miciotto.1 In her complaint, Moore claimed to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & GraniteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Price v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Hymes v. Monroe MacK SalesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jenkinson v. North Oaks Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006