Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Beall

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1801PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case stated for the opinion of the court. On the 20th July 1800 the present suit was commenced on a bond given by the defendants to Armstrong, dated the 6th May 1799, and duly assigned to the plaintiff on the 30th June 1800. The defendants plead payment with notice of a set off.

Read the full summary

Case stated for the opinion of the court. On the 20th July 1800 the present suit was commenced on a bond given by the defendants to Armstrong, dated the 6th May 1799, and duly assigned to the plaintiff on the 30th June 1800. The defendants plead payment with notice of a set off. They claim a defalcation of a joint bill by William Cameron (since deceased) and Alexander Armstrong aforesaid, to Andrew Baine, for the payment of 36I. 5 s. 6d. on the 9th October 1799, and duly assigned to the said Benjamin Beall on the 28th February 1800. Cameron the co-obligor died before the times of either of…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

There can be no doubt, but circumstanced as this case is, the hill is a good set off against the bond.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cochran v. CutterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Stewart ex rel. Salaignac v. CoulterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1825
  3. Du Pont v. BauduyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1822

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API