Legal Opinion

Graybill v. Herman

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

Petition by certain tenants of the intervenor to review the determination of the Bent Administrator denying petitioners’ protest of an order granting a rent increase pursuant to the 6% annual return provisions of the Emergency Housing Bent Control Law (L. 1946, ch. 274, § 4, as amd.). Petitioners’ challenge is made on two grounds: (1) that the use of the purchase price as a basis for determining the net annual return rather than assessed valuation was erroneous because of a special circumstance involved in the sale; and (2) that there was a decrease in essential services because of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baranofsky v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API