Legal Opinion

Shim-Larkin v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 23, 2020No. 1:16-cv-06099Unknown

1Opinion

MARA UE i ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: □□ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT mar □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Heena Shim-Larkin, Plaintiff, 16-cv-6099 (AJN) ~ MEMORANDUM City of New York, OPINION & ORDER Defendant. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Plaintiff filed a motion to recuse the Undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). Dkt. No. 699. For the reasons explained below, that motion is DENIED. I. Background The Court assumes familiarity with the background facts of this case. In February 2019, Magistrate Judge Fox sanctioned the Defendant and its former attorney Scott Silverman for making a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Carol BaylessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Michael Lovaglia, Martin Clune and Peter PavlisakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. John P. Deluca v. Long Island Lighting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Rankin v. City of Niagara Falls, Department of Public WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API