United States v. Howard M. Keeton and Hazel L. Keeton
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
Section 119 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 pertinently provides that “There shall be excluded from gross income of an employee the value of any meals or lodging furnished to him by his employer for the convenience of the employer, but only if — (1) in the case of meals, the meals are furnished on the business premises of the employer *
In this suit for refund under 1346(a) (1), the sole question is whether Section 119 is applicable to exclude from gross income a monthly cash allowance paid by the State of Colorado to a highway patrolman to defray his expenses incurred for meals required…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Richard D. Morelan and Margaret Morelan, United States of America v. Karl W. ChristeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Daniel F. Barrett and Margaret G. Barrett Edgar B. Garner and Evelyn T. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Keeton v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commissioner v. KowalskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Weinberg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Coombs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
- Ralph A. Wilson and Joanne B. Wilson, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.