Legal Opinion

Critney v. National City Ford, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 3, 2003No. 3:03-cr-00239PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND THIS ACTION TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In 2001, Plaintiff Critney purchased a used 2000 Ford Taurus from Defendant National City Ford, Inc. (“NCF”), a subsidiary of Defendant United Auto Group, Inc. (“UAG”). In January 2002, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against NCF in state court, alleging that NCF had failed to inform him that the Taurus was a prior rental vehicle. The Complaint lists numerous state causes of action and a single federal claim for violation of the Magnu-son-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 2301 et seq.)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ahearn v. Charter Township of BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Donahue v. Bill Page Toyota, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cesar Perez v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
  2. Cynthia N. Araujo et al. v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
  3. Fernando Huerta Chavarin v. General Motors LLC, et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2025
  4. Guadalupe A. Andrade v. General Motors LLC et alDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
  5. Howard v. Bow Wow Properties I, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API