Critney v. National City Ford, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND THIS ACTION TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In 2001, Plaintiff Critney purchased a used 2000 Ford Taurus from Defendant National City Ford, Inc. (“NCF”), a subsidiary of Defendant United Auto Group, Inc. (“UAG”). In January 2002, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against NCF in state court, alleging that NCF had failed to inform him that the Taurus was a prior rental vehicle. The Complaint lists numerous state causes of action and a single federal claim for violation of the Magnu-son-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 2301 et seq.)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ahearn v. Charter Township of BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Donahue v. Bill Page Toyota, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cesar Perez v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Cynthia N. Araujo et al. v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
- Fernando Huerta Chavarin v. General Motors LLC, et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Guadalupe A. Andrade v. General Motors LLC et alDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Howard v. Bow Wow Properties I, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.