Legal Opinion

In Re Multidistrict Patent Litigation Involving the Kaehni Patent

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided March 31, 1970No. 36PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1343OPINION AND ORDER

Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON*, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.

The nine actions involved in this multidistrict litigation were brought by Frank J. Kaehni and Marie Kaehni and each charge the infringement of United States Patent No. 2,463,280. Like many of the defendants, we were unable to tell from the complaints exactly how the patent was allegedly being infringed but since there were common plaintiffs and a single patent involved in all nine actions,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Resource Exploration, Inc., Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1980
  2. In re Embro Patent Infringement LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
  3. In Re Multidistrict Patent Litigation Involving the Kaehni PatentUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API