Legal Opinion

Barsness v. Scott

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided November 5, 2003No. 04-02-00928-CVPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

CATHERINE STONE, Justice.

Richard and Cheryl Barsness (the “Barenesses”) seek to have this court set aside a judgment enforcing an arbitration award. We affirm the trial court’s judgment as reformed.

BACKGROUND

Madison Scott purchased from the Bare-nesses their shares of stock in their company, which owned two pizza companies. The purchase agreement acknowledged a pre-existing dispute between the Bareness-es and Mr. Gatti’s, Inc. (a restaurant franchiser) would not be an impediment to the sale. The purchase agreement contained an arbitration provision. This arbitration…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. CVN Group, Inc. v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gulf Oil Corporation v. GuidryTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. City of Baytown v. C.L. Winter, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  4. Callahan & Associates v. Orangefield Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Daniewicz v. Thermo Instrument Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Pheng Investments, Inc. v. RodriquezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Centex/Vestal v. Friendship West Baptist Church, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  3. Xtria L.L.C. v. International Insurance Alliance Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  4. Victor S. Elgohary v. Gilbert A. Herrera, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  5. City of East Providence v. United Steelworkers, Local 15509Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API