Solar Dynamics, Inc. v. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LaROSE, Judge.
Solar Dynamics, Inc. (Solar), appeals the trial court’s order dismissing, without prejudice, its legal malpractice action against Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C. (Buchanan), and Christopher E. Paradies. 1 We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(A). After careful review of the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm.
Introduction
Solar hired Buchanan and Mr. Paradies to seek a patent for Solar’s fastening shade system for playground structures. 2 Allegedly, the issued patent was inadequate to protect Solar’s idea and design from infringement by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. ManningSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Execu-Tech Bus. Sys., Inc. v. New Oji Paper Co. Ltd.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Exceller Software Corp. v. DineDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- JACQUELINE CALDERIN, etc. v. QUARTZ HILL MINING, LLC, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- POINT CONVERSIONS, LLC v. WPB HOTEL PARTNERS, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- POINT CONVERSIONS, LLC v. WPB HOTEL PARTNERS, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- White v. VieraDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021