Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 3, 1997No. A97A0011PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

Joseph Smith, Jr. contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his burglary conviction because the unfinished house from which he removed a fireplace was not completely enclosed or secured and had not yet been used as a dwelling. This argument is without merit.

Under OCGA § 16-7-1 (a), “[a] person commits the offense of burglary when, without authority and with the intent to commit a felony or theft therein, he enters or remains within the dwelling house of another or any building, vehicle, railroad car, watercraft, or other such structure designed for use as the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. The People v. GillespieIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Clark v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Floyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. StoreySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Weeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. State v. AshbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API