Legal Opinion

Cherry v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 18, 1996No. CR 95-885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant Kyle Cherry files this appeal from a trial court decision, denying his Rule 37 post-conviction petition. The trial court held Cherry’s petition was untimely, citing Fox v. State, 309 Ark. 619, 832 S.W.2d 244 (1992), as controlling.

Procedurally, this case commenced with the state initiating a murder in the first-degree charge against Cherry. On July 14, 1989, Cherry pled guilty, and his conviction and life imprisonment sentence were entered on July 17, 1989. Cherry filed a timely appeal, and this court affirmed Cherry’s conviction on June 11, 1990. Cherry v. State,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Ford v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. James v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Whitmore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Jerry Lynn Easter v. Roger Endell, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marvin Gene Pearson v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. Raglin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Marvin Gene Pearson v. Larry NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API