State v. Harper
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKrivosha, C.J.
I find that once again, I must in part concur with and in part dissent from the majority in its decision concerning the proper disposition of a case involving the commission of a first degree murder. See, State v. Holtan, 205 Neb. 314, 287 N.W.2d 671 (1980); State v. Williams, 205 Neb. 56, 287 N.W.2d 18 (1979); State v. Otey, 205 Neb. 90, 287 N.W.2d 36 (1979); State v. Peery, 205 Neb. 271, 287 N.W.2d 71 (1980); State v. Rust, ante p. 320, 303 N.W.2d 490 (1981).
I concur with the majority’s finding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed, and likewise concur with the majority’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. EllisNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.