Legal Opinion

Smathers v. . Sprouse

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1907PublishedCited by 13 opinions

MotioN to revive the above-entitled dormant judgment, heard on appeal from the Clerk by O. H. Allen, Jat September Term, 1906, of Buncombe County Superior Court. From the order of his Honor affirming the judgment of the Clerk the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Upon the hearing before the Clerk, defendants offered to show that they had not been served with sum mons in tbe original action. To this the plaintiff objected and the Clerk sustained the objection, ruling that the judgment could not be attacked in this way in this proceeding, and ordered and adjudged that execution issue. There is no error in such ruling, and his Plonor very properly affirmed it, as it is supported by many uniform precedents. A void judgment may be regarded as a nullity and attacked whenever it may come in question, but it must appear affirmatively upon the judgment record…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doyle v. . Brown, GuardianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  2. Card v. Finch.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Sumner v. . SessomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Spencer v. . CredleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clark v. . HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Harrington v. RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Clark v. Carolina Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Downing v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API