Legal Opinion

Mertens v. Wakefield

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Aotiobt to foreclose a mortgage upon certain real estate situate in the city of Syracuse, M. T.

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, W. S., J.

On December 9, 1889, Robert A. Titus was one of the trustees of the estate of Alexander Dissel, deceased. He was also the owner of lot No. 1 in block No. 37 in the city of Syracuse. Upon that day, for the expressed consideration of one dollar, he conveyed the said lot to his wife. Upon the same day, Mr. Titus and his wife gave a bond to the father of the former, Silas Titus, for the sum of $2,500, secured by a mortgage upon the same property. Silas Titus appears to have paid nothing therefor, but he immediately thereafter assigned such bond and mortgage to Alexander Dissel,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Greene v. . WarnickNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Hebbard v. . HaughianNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Martin v. . HillenNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Wadsworth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Mickles v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bronner v. WalrathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Lacks v. LacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API