Legal Opinion
Leo F. Kreiling v. H. v. Field
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 14, 1970No. 23592PublishedCited by 164 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, who conducted his own defense, and was convicted by a California state jury of two counts of obstructing telephones (Cal.Penal Code, § 591) and one count of burglary (Cal.Penal Code, § 459), appeals from an order of the district court denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant claims that he did not intelligently waive counsel.
Counsel was appointed for appellant and he appeared at the preliminary hearing and at the arraignment. On the day set for trial appellant expressed his dissatisfaction with his attorney. At any time he might have had the services of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Aaron Hodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Tom Eskridge, in Re Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent of Washington State Penitentiary at Walla Walla, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Harold Jackson v. The People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Charles Thomas Yeaman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by164 opinions
- Anthony Lee Chaney v. Samuel Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and Lloyd E. Bramlett, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Bonin v. VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Michael Knaubert v. Goldsmith, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Arthur Lee Norris v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- (HC) Rodriguez v. FisherDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.