Legal Opinion
City Water Company v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1895No. 338PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Question Certified by Court of Civil Appeals for Third District, in an appeal from Travis County.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Associate Justice.
—The Court of Civil Appeals, Third Supreme Judicial District, has certified to this court the following statement and question:
“This is a suit in the nature of a quo warranto instituted by the State of Texas to forfeit the charter and franchises of the City Water Company, a corporation chartered under the general laws of said State.
“The prayer in the petition or information for the appointment of a receiver was, in open court, waived before the District Court ruled on the plea in abatement.
“The City Water Company, appellant, in due time and form filed a plea in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Memphis & Little Rock Railroad v. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Meyer v. Johnston & StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Ryan v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Eldridge v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
- St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Whitaker & BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hicks v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Federal Crude Oil Co. v. Yount-Lee Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. LasaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Palestine Water & Power Co. v. City of PalestineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of Texas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.