Legal Opinion

Clarence Duke McGann v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 13, 1957No. 7517_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying what is denominated a petition for writ of habeas corpus but which was properly treated by the District Judge as a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Appellant had pleaded guilty to a charge of armed bank robbery in violation of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 2113. He contends that the indictment does not charge a crime because the bank which he is charged with robbing is described as located on an Air Force base and must therefore be considered as a “banking facility” established in accordance with Air Force regulations and not as a bank. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pifer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  2. Aaron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  3. Dickerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Gordon R. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. James Edward Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. WatkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. Clarence Duke McGann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  5. Fay Clinton Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API