Legal Opinion

P. W. Chapman & Co. v. Cornelius

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 3, 1930No. 187PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as abové).

In its nearest approach to the definition of a.real estate broker contained in section 440 of the statute .(Consol. Laws N. Y. c. 50), the plaintiff’s conduct should, be regarded with reference to an attempt to negotiate, for a fee or commission, a loan to- be secured by mortgage on real estate. Unless what he did falls within that phase of .the statute; his suit is not affected by its provisions. Furthermore, the law applies only if it is to be construed broadly enough to cover simply calling the' defendant’s attention to a prospective pieee'of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weingast v. Rialto Pastry Shop, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Knauss v. Gottfried Krueger Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Reichardt v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  5. Stout v. William Kennelly, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bittner v. American-Marietta CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1958
  2. Ames v. Ideal Cement Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Evans v. Riverside International RacewayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Kuffler v. ListDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  5. Lyons v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API