Legal Opinion
In Re McClaskie
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 7, 1988No. Bankruptcy 2-88-01180PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER 13 PLAN
BARBARA J. SELLERS, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the requested confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan proposed by Jack L. McClaskie and upon this Court’s independent obligation to find that all statutory tests for confirmation, as set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 1325, are met. In this case the confirmation standard in question is the requirement that the plan comply “with the provisions of this chapter and with the other applicable provisions of this title.” 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(1).
The Court has jurisdiction in this matter under 28…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In the Matter of Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson, Debtors. Comprehensive Accounting Corporation v. Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- In Re MortonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1984
3Cited by14 opinions
- Soderlund v. Cohen (In Re Soderlund)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re RifkinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- In Re WertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2009
- In Re ProsperUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- In Re MohrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.