Legal Opinion
Pfannenstiel v. Merrill Lynch Pierce
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 20, 2007No. 04-1274PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Robert Pfannenstiel (Pfannenstiel) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his motion to vacate the judgment of an arbitration panel and the district court’s decision that the arbitration panel was protected by arbitral immunity. Pfannenstiel contends that his motion was timely because he served it at the earliest possible date he could have known that grounds to vacate existed and that arbitral immunity does not apply because the arbitration panel committed misconduct outside of its judicial function. Because Pfannenstiel’s arguments lack merit, we AFFIRM.
BACKGROUND
In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Montoya v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Milton McCray v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- George Corey, Trust Fund v. New York Stock ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- S. Ezra Austern and Esther Austern v. The Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Impact Energy Resources, LLC v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Webster v. A.T. Kearney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Sacks v. DietrichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.