Legal Opinion
Schlater v. Haynie
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided December 13, 1991PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TODD, Presiding Judge.
The defendants, Joseph S. Haynie, Louis M. Haynie, Morning Surf East, Inc., and Aquafirm Systems, Inc., have appealed from a non-jury judgment against them and in favor of the plaintiff, Thomas W. Schlater, for $175,584.87 for a note, unpaid rent under a lease from Schlater to Morning Surf East (M.S.E.) and attorneys’ fees.
The basic facts are not controverted:
On May 14, 1979, Buryi McClung, Gordon Thompson and another organized a Tennessee corporation named Morning Surf East, Inc., for the purpose of manufacturing and selling water beds under a license of patent…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Merriman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- Electric Power Board of Chattanooga v. St. Joseph Valley Structural Steel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
- Continental Bankers Life Insurance Co. of the South v. Bank of AlamoTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Balsinger v. Town of MadisonvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Betty Saint Rogers v. Louisville Land CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Gordon v. Greenview Hospital, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Cuthill v. Greenmark, LLC (In Re World Vision Entertainment, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- Southeast Texas Inns, Inc. v. Prime Hospitality CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- CAO Holdings, Inc. v. TrostTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.