Commonwealth v. Fortune
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
Appellate counsel asks leave to withdraw, arguing that she can find no issues on which appellant might reasonably expect to get appellate relief.
In such cases, we are required to make our own “review of the record and brief,” Commonwealth v. Liska, 252 Pa.Super. 103, 108, 380 A.2d 1303, 1305 (1977). Doing so here, we find that appellate counsel is mistaken.
Appellant waived his right to a jury trial. However, the waiver colloquy did not meet the requirements of Commonwealth v. Williams, 454 Pa. 368, 312 A.2d 597 (1973), in that the lower court failed to inform appellant that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. LiskaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. McNealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981