Anderson v. Larry H. Miller Communications Corp.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THORNE, Judge:
¶ 1 Steve Anderson appeals from the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Larry H. Mille Communications Corporation (LHMCC), Dean Paynter, and Chris Baum (collectively, Defendants) on Anderson's claims of breach of contract, promissory estoppel, fraud, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
BACKGROUND 1
¶ 2 In 2007, Anderson had been employed by the Davis County School District as a high school drama teacher for twenty-eight years and was two years away from retiring with a full pension. Anderson…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Eggert v. Wasatch Energy Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Nunley v. Westates Casing Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
- Gold Standard, Inc. v. Getty Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anderson v. Larry H. Miller Communications Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Airstar v. Keystone AviationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- Simons v. Park City RV Resort, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Co-Diagnostics v. Hukui TechnologyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
- Lawry Han v. TSI USA LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026