Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Brennan
Petitioner contends that in 1964 respondent, while acting “under color of . . . statute” or “under color of . . . custom, or usage” of the State of Mississippi, subjected her to the deprivation of her right under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment not to be denied service in respondent’s restaurant due to racial discrimination in which the State of Mississippi was involved, and that therefore respondent is liable to her in damages under 42 U. S. C. § 1983. To recover under § 1983 petitioner must prove two separate and independent elements: first, that respondent subjected…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.