Legal Opinion

Martell v. Chrysler Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 1992No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this products liability action, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering a bifurcated trial of the issues of liability and damages (see, 22 NYCRR 202.42 [a]). We reject plaintiff’s contention that the court’s ruling effectively precluded him from proving the cause of his injuries. Although the court did not allow plaintiff to offer proof regarding pain and suffering or economic damage, he was afforded considerable latitude to develop the nature and extent of his injuries as they related to the liability aspect of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kuncio v. Millard Fillmore HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Byrd v. Genesee HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Crumb v. FallonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Eastern Paramedics, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Cybulski v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Martell v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API