Legal Opinion

McFall v. Fouts

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1966No. 20,192PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPrime, J.

— Helen Marie McFall, the appellant herein, and William Jasper Fouts, appellee, owned certain real estate by the entireties prior to their divorce. A separation agreement was entered into whereby the real estate was to be sold and the proceeds divided in accordance with the agreement. Commissioners were appointed for that purpose. The record shows that no action was taken by the commissioners and later on, *599after the divorce, an action in partition was filed by Fouts asking that the land be adjudged to be still owned by plaintiff Fouts and defendant, Helen Marie McFall, as tenants-in-common…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bryan v. YoderIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Rout v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Gowan v. GreathouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Bass v. McDonaldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peter C. Reilly Tr. v. Anthony Wayne OilIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API