Commonwealth v. Lovette
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentSpaeth, Judge
The majority holds that the police, by putting appellant into the police wagon and transporting him to the scene of the burglary, did not “arrest” him, but instead carried out a permissible “intermediate response”, short of a full arrest. At 392. This holding, I submit, is incorrect under a number of decisions, which Judge HESTER collected and stated in Commonwealth v. Gray, 262 Pa.Super. 351, 396 A.2d 790 (1979). In Gray, police were given a description of robbers and stopped four individuals, put them into the police van, and drove back to the scene of the robbery. Judge HESTER said:
Nor do…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.