Legal Opinion

Salcido v. Genung

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1896No. Civil No. 479PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. A. C. Baker, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBethune, J.

This is an action of ejectment for the possession of the northeast one fourth of section sixteen, town*24ship one north, range two east, Gila and Salt River base and meridian, Maricopa County, by appellee, Charles B. Genung, who was the plaintiff in the court below, and who alleges in his complaint that, ever since the first day of October, 1884, and long prior thereto, he and his grantors and predecessors in interest have been entitled to the possession, and until the ouster herein complained of were in the actual, peaceable, and quiet possession, and that appellee is now entitled to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holden v. AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Henderson v. WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API