Wilhoit v. Hancock
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 31 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 2 Grccnlcaf on Ev., sees. 571, 577, 579, pp. 539, 540. 2 Mar., 129 ; Applegate vs. Ruble. Phillips on Evidence, part 5, pp. 218, 219. Revised Statutes, 2 Stanton, 128.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Williams
delivered tub opinion op the court:
This was an action by the father, the appellee, for the loss of service consequent upon the seduction, debauching, and impregnation of his daughter, who still lived as a member in his family, under his control, and without any specified compensation for service, though she labored, and was over twenty-one years of age.
The suit was brought within one year from, the birth of the child, but not from the act of seduction. The jury, on issue and evidence, found for plaintiff five thousand dollars in damages; and the court refusing to disturb it, and having…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wilhoite v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1866
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. BoyettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Morgan v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Ortiz Ríos v. VieraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1941
- Monahan v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Woodward v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.