Legal Opinion

Arsenio Arias Henriquez Hernandez v. Michael T. Rose, Kristi Noem, and Pamela Bondi

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 2025No. 1:25-cv-02221Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ARSENIO ARIAS HENRIQUEZ : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:25-CV-2221 HERNANDEZ, : : (Judge Neary) Petitioner : : v. : : MICHAEL T. ROSE, KRISTI NOEM, : and PAMELA BONDI, : : Respondents : MEMORANDUM Individuals facing immigration proceedings typically receive bond hearings. The purpose of these hearings is to determine whether these individuals are either a flight risk or a danger to the community. If they are not, an immigration judge may order them released on bond pending the disposition of their immigration proceedings.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Xochitl Hernandez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API