Ames v. Hehner
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentShanahan, J.
In an ironic 180° maneuver, this court has transformed the discovery doctrine, previously an equitable solution to the harshly literal onus of a statute of limitations, into a more severe burden on one who, through diligence, discovers a previously undiscovered cause of action. Whereas equitable consideration, inherent in the discovery doctrine, formerly assisted and protected the diligent, today the majority of this court molds the discovery doctrine into a hindrance and peril to the diligent.
I agree with one conclusion reached by this court’s majority, namely, Ames did not discover, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Spath v. MorrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
- Johansen v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Thiel v. TAURUS DRILLING LTD. 1980-IIMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- Shew v. Coon Bay Loafers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.