Legal Opinion

McDonough Construction Co. v. Benefield

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1961No. 38962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

The court erred in overruling the special demurrer to subparagraph (a) of paragraph 23 of the petition. The petition shows that all work on the hangar had not been completed and does not show that the plaintiff did not know of the unfinished floor. It would seem that the defendant would have met the requirement of ordinary care as to subcontractors on the premises by giving some kind of notice that there was an unfinished section in the concrete floor. The defendant would not be required to put a guard around the incomplete section, of the presence of which the plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. George v. Continental Wrecking Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ellington v. Tolar Consruction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Benefield v. McDonough Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Tolar Construction Co. v. EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Benefield v. McDonough Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Ellington v. Tolar Consruction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API