Legal Opinion

State v. Zismer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1985No. 13874PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Presiding Judge.

Defendants Robert Zismer and Elwyn Gayle Dull were convicted by a jury of assault in the second degree by attempting to cause physical injury to another, in violation of § 565.060, RSMo 1978, now repealed. Their punishment was assessed at a fine of $300. They have appealed jointly as permitted by Rule 30.01(b).

In this court, counsel has briefed six assignments of error. They are: 1) that the venue of the crime was not proved; 2) that former § 565.060 was unconstitutional, because it was “vague, indefinite and confusing, in that it fails to require intent, specific…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. OldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Sherman Alphonse Gendron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  4. State v. WickizerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. State v. DanforthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. United States v. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. State v. NewlonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. LightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. KnifongMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API