Legal Opinion

Chunes v. Duluth, W. & P. Ry. Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEB, District Judge.

On March 20, 1923, Messrs. Dahl & McDonald, attorneys at law, residing and practicing law in the city of Minneapolis, Minn., commenced this, a personal injury action, in the district court of Dakota county, Minn. The case was removed to this court on the ground of diversity of citizenship of the parties. Thereafter a motion was made on behalf of the plaintiff to remand the case to the state court on the ground that the complaint states a cause of action under and within the provisions of the federal Employers’ Liability Act (Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665), and under the terms…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago, M. & ST. P. RY. CO. v. SchendelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  2. Chunes v. Duluth, W. & P. RY. CO.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1923
  3. Savarin v. Union Pac. R. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re RandolphSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. In Re Disbarment of Robert J. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Weinard v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API