Legal Opinion
Bonner v. Sisters of Providence Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 25, 1987No. A034681PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, J.
The Sisters of Providence Corporation, board of directors of Providence Hospital, and medical staff of Providence Hospital (appellants) appeal a judgment granting respondent Dr. Ernest Bonner’s petition for writ of administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5), in which respondent challenged appellants’ decision to revoke his provisional nephrology privileges at Providence Hospital. Appellants contend that (1) respondent’s petition was barred by the statute of limitations, (2) the trial court erroneously considered evidence of a Board of Medical Quality Assurance (BMQA)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ettinger v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Unterthiner v. Desert Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Cipriotti v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hongsathavij v. Queen of Angels/Hollywood Presbyterian Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Webman v. Little Co. of Mary HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Huang v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Armin v. Riverside Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Oskooi v. Fountain Valley Regional Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.