Legal Opinion

State v. Patfol, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 21, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

76 N.J. Super. 287 (1962)

184 A.2d 433

STATE OF NEW JERSEY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

PATFOL, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND

VINCENT SULLIVAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 17, 1962.

Decided September 21, 1962.

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.

Mr. Philip C. Geibel argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Peter P. Cascone, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

The issue here presented is whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abbotts Dairies, Inc. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. State v. Patfol Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. State v. A. & D. TRUCKING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. RH MacY & Co. Inc. v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAX.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Gindy Mfg. Corp. v. CARDINALE TRUCK. CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Fresco v. PolicastroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. State v. MundyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  5. State v. Patfol, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API