Legal Opinion

State v. Charles

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Allen, J., at July Term, 1912, of Forsyth. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice WaVcer.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This is a motion to reinstate the case, which was dismissed 7 November, 1912, at this term, on motion of the Attorney-General, for failure to file an appeal bond, or to print the record, or to assign errors. Counsel of defendant base the motion to reinstate the appeal upon the ground that the appeal bond was filed with the clerk of the Superior Court on 2 November, 1912, and was mailed to the clerk of this Court at once, but failed to reach him, and was returned to the clerk who mailed it, for the lack of sufficient postage. It was thereupon mailed again, but was received by the clerk of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. . GeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. State v. . SearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
  4. State v. . KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
  5. State v. . NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. . DickersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. . HegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API