Legal Opinion

United States v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1795PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

2 U.S. 333 (____)

2 Dall. 333

THE UNITED STATES

versus

CALDWELL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Rawle, the District Attorney, objected.

BY THE COURT: — We have no hesitation in granting the indulgence of a delay for a few days. The cause may, therefore, be continued 'till this day week; and, in the meantime, let the attachment issue; but it can only be in the case, in which the subpœna has been actually served. The practice must always be strict in the previous stages of the business, before an attachment can be awarded; and all the documents, upon which it is awarded, must be filed with the Court.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. CaldwellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1795

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  2. Conover v. MontemuroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. WalkerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995
  4. United States v. SoblenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. United States v. Isaac DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API