Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Garrison

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 7, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The writ of certiorari brings up the record in a workmen’s compensation matter wherein the award to the employe was affirmed by the Essex Common Pleas on appeal. The single point argued by the prosecutor is that the workmen’s compensation bureau is without jurisdiction for the reason, as alleged, that the employment was casual, and therefore not such as to come within the purview of the statute.

Maude Harrington was skilled as a household worker in the various duties that are incident to a home, including serving, sewing, cooking and cleaning. There were several *755families, including Mrs.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forrester v. EckersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gray v. GreenwoodPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1941
  2. Balmforth v. McMurrayNew York County Court, Essex County · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API