Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Armour & Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 24, 1973No. 44012PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Certiorari on the relation of employer to review the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding compensation. Employer challenges the commission’s finding that the employee’s disability was caused by her employment.

The employee had worked for Armour & Company since 1951. In 1964 she was transferred from Kansas City, Kansas, to Worthington, Minnesota, where she worked as a meat trimmer. Pier duties at Worthington required her to stand on a metal grating over a concrete floor for as long as 10 hours a day, 5 days a week.

Employee suffers from congenital foot deformities described…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Langlais v. Superior Plating, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Patnode v. Lyon's Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Mattson v. Prospect Foundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Newcomb v. Richfield Yards, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Mattson v. Prospect Foundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API