Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Cowan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 14, 1984No. 82—1781Published

1DissentJustice Rizzi

I do not agree with the majority that the Prim instruction had a coercive effect on the jury. Also, I do not believe that the trial court erred in giving the Prim instruction. Accordingly, I would affirm the judgment.

The jury found defendant guilty of unlawful restraint and attempt burglary, and not guilty of burglary, home invasion, aggravated kidnaping, two counts of armed violence and two counts of armed robbery. I fail to see how this finding demonstrates coercion. To me, the fact that the jury did not reach the same finding as to all counts mitigates against the allegation that the jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PrestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. People v. DaviesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API