Legal Opinion

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Holston

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 25, 1983No. 81-0401; CA A25447Published

1Opinion of the CourtVanhoomissen, J.

SAIF appeals from a Workers’ Compensation Board order that awarded claimant reimbursement for travel expenses from his home in Springfield to Medford for treatment of a compensable injury. It contends that the Board erred in setting aside SAIF’s denial of the travel claim. We affirm.

Claimant sustained a compensable injury in 1979. During the course of his claim, he was seen by Dr. Bryson, a chiropractor, Drs. Stainsby and Zivin, neurologists, Drs. Robinson, Marxer, Degge and Nagel, orthopedic surgeons, Dr. Myers, a neurosurgeon, and Drs. Hoffmeister and Litchman, whose specialties are not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Pyle v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API