Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Pinnacle Coal & Coke Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1926No. 5432PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge :

The plaintiff owns .9 of an acre of surface in Kanawha County. The defendant leases and for a number of years has operated the coal underlying and surrounding plaintiff’s property. During the earlier years of operation the mine was drained through, the drift mouth, which is located three or four hundred feet below plaintiff. As the development of the mine progressed, drainage through the drift mouth became impracticable. In 1921 a shaft was sunk above plaintiff, and the mine water has since been pumped out through the shaft, from which it flows across plaintiff’s lot. Prior to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hargreaves v. KimberlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Watts v. C. I. Johnson & Bowman Real Estate Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  3. Lowther v. BridgemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Preston County Coke Co. v. Elkins Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Mary Helen Coal Co. v. HatfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buffalo Mining Co. v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fourth Davis Island Land Co. v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Herold v. C. J. Hughes & Hamilton Gas Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Buffalo Min. Co. v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hobbs v. Division of HighwaysWest Virginia Court of Claims · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API