Legal Opinion

Hewes v. Miller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1916No. Appeal, No. 267PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 267, Jan. T., 1916, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Erie Co., Sept. Term, 1912, No. 148, on judgment entered for plaintiff non obstante veredicto in case of Charles P. Hewes v. Fred J. Miller, G. Daniel Baldwin, Robert W. Lowry, Henry Mayer, Sr.; Mary Haller, Charles J. Haller, Frank A. Haller, Edward W. Haller, Cora E. Haller, Otto Haller, Leah O. Haller, Alma C. Haller, Charles J. Haller, John M. Miller and Albert C. Doll, executors of Jacob Haller,…

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 267, Jan. T., 1916, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Erie Co., Sept. Term, 1912, No. 148, on judgment entered for plaintiff non obstante veredicto in case of Charles P. Hewes v. Fred J. Miller, G. Daniel Baldwin, Robert W. Lowry, Henry Mayer, Sr.; Mary Haller, Charles J. Haller, Frank A. Haller, Edward W. Haller, Cora E. Haller, Otto Haller, Leah O. Haller, Alma C. Haller, Charles J. Haller, John M. Miller and Albert C. Doll, executors of Jacob Haller, deceased; the City of Erie, Pennsylvania, and. The Stearns Company. Ejectment for the recovery of a strip of land in the City…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below directing it to be entered in favor of the plaintiff non obstante veredicto.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stearns Co. v. HewesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Hewes v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
  3. Guzzi v. Delaware & H. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
  4. Guzzi v. Delaware & Hudson Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Heiner v. HewesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API